Close Your Eyes, Full Speed Ahead

I get so sick of political correctness.  The Bible teaches us to be kind, and to treat others as they would like to be treated; but when people demand to be treated in an unreasonable way, that’s a problem.  When so-called authorities who aren’t even in the game demand that we treat others in an unreasonable way, that’s idiocy.

My daughter sent me this link to an article involving the US State Department, and its latest directive from its “Chief Diversity Officer”.  He claims that phrases like “hold down the fort,” “rule of thumb,” “handicap,” and “going Dutch” are offensive racial or ethnic slurs that must be avoided.  He identifies their victims as Native Americans, abused women, people with abilities impaired, and people from Holland.  There are two problems here:  since when did the State Department become the language police?; and where on earth did this guy get his information?

As an English teacher, I have a library of books on the origins of words, phrases, and expressions.  There is no doubt in any of my sources that the term “going Dutch” was a British insult based upon the stereotypical reputation of the stinginess of the Dutch people.  It hasn’t meant that in America for decades, but okay–I can avoid that expression on principle.  But there is also unanimous agreement that “holding the fort” [its original form] dates to 1864, when Gen. Sherman commanded his troops to watch out for the Confederate army.  It has nothing at all to do with frontiersmen or Native Americans.

(On a related note:  if Native Americans were to attack a fort in a savage attempt to slaughter its inhabitants, would it be ethnically insensitive to consider them bad guys, and to make up and repeat a historically accurate expression reflecting their evil intent?  The Creek Indians were known for their attacks on settlers; must we whitewash or ignore history and eliminate from our language the expression, “I’ll be there, Good Lord willing, and the Creek don’t rise”?  For that saying has nothing to do with a babbling brook and everything to do with murderous tribesmen.  Do we have to apologize to the Creeks every time we refer to their bloody past?  If so, then I guess I deserve an apology every time anyone refers to my ancestors as “William the Bastard” or “wicked King John”.  I won’t even mention King Louis the Fat.)

“Rule of thumb” has nothing to do with some obscure antique law from some unnamed land (that apparently spoke some form of English), and instead dates back 8 centuries to when builders would use the distance between the knuckle and the end of the thumb as a rough approximation of an inch–using the thumb as a ruler.  “Handicap” has nothing to do with crippled people begging; it refers to a gambling game that lent its name to gambling on horses and the practice of weighing down or impeding a fast horse in order to make a race fair.

I guess it’s wishful thinking to expect our State Department to focus on things like Iraq, Syria, and Israel instead of fabricated word origins.  But as long as I’m on a rant, let me share three examples of my own “political correctness” that I think everyone needs to rally around:

  • The genius of our Founders in the writing of the US Constitution.  Every American ought to be insulted and say so when some politician, academic, or reporter denigrates the wisdom of their original intent;
  • The status of the Jews as God’s chosen people.  For centuries, society and history have criticized the Jews (primarily because of their successes and blessings); and today’s one-world emphasis considers them an impediment to justice for Arab Palestinians.  Remember:  it was God Himself Who said of the Jews, “I will bless him that blesses them, and curse him that curses them…”;
  • The name of God Himself.  We should not be shy about reminding people that the King of all Kings and Lord of all Lords deserves to be addressed with respect, reverence, and obedience.

And my sources are unimpeachable.  I guess I’ll never be qualified to work for the State Department. 

 

 

 

Stephanie and the Close Away Family–A Fairly Tale

The next in a series of stories written for my children to read to my grandchildren.  Artwork courtesy Mrs. Sharon Dahl.

 

When Stephanie was very young (as young as Joshua was before he got to be so grown up), she was fairly curious.

She never thought of herself as curious; she may not even have known what the word curious meant.  But she knew, and her mother certainly knew, that she liked to ask questions.

“Mommy, why is the sky blue?” Stephanie asked.

“So that you can see the yellow sun better,” her mother said, washing the dishes.

“Mommy, why is my hair green?” Stephanie asked.

“So that people will notice your pretty brown eyes more,” her mother said, still washing the dishes.

“Mommy, why don’t I have a daddy?” Stephanie asked.

Her mother stopped washing the dishes.  She picked up a little towel and dried her hands very slowly.  “Why do you ask?” she said in that special voice that mothers use when there is a problem but they want to pretend that everything is all right. 

I’m sure that Emilie would have recognized that there really was a problem, but Stephanie was fairly young and fairly busy, so she didn’t notice that her mother was unhappy.  She was juggling three acorns and didn’t look up as she answered.

“I was just thinking about the birds and the bees,” she said, dropping two of the acorns.  “Oh, nuts,” she muttered, bending over to pick them up.

Her mother acted like she had a hiccup stuck in her throat, but she managed to repeat her daughter’s words.  “The birds and the bees?”

“Yes,” said Stephanie as she stacked the acorns in the corner of their little home under the maple tree.  “The birds have daddies, but the bees don’t.  I don’t think I’m sweet enough to be a bee.”

“No, honey, you’re not,” said her mother with a sigh.

“And I’m not flighty enough to a bird, even if I did have a daddy,” Stephanie continued, flapping her fairly small wings.

“That question is still up in the air,” her mother replied, taking Stephanie by the hand and walking with her into the living room to have a seat on the couch.  “But you do have a daddy.  He just doesn’t live here.” 

“Why not?”  Stephanie asked, poking at a spot on the wall of their tree house.

“He lives far away, like Grammie and Poppa, and it’s not easy for him to come and see us.”

“Does that mean we’re not a close family?” Stephanie asked.

“I guess that’s open for discussion,” said her mother.  “People can live far away and still be close.  Farness is measured in miles, but closeness is measured in smiles.”

“Hey—that rhymes!” Stephanie exclaimed, smiling broadly.

“And when we count the smiles, I’d say we’re a very close family.  Your daddy loves you very much; you just don’t remember him because you were so young when we moved here.”

So Stephanie’s mother told her (with a few fairly curious interruptions) about how she had won the lottery (“What’s a lottery?”) and had gone to Ireland (“What’s Ireland?”) where she met and fell in love with a leprechaun (“What’s a leprechaun?”) and they got married and had twins (“What’s twins?”) named Stephanie and Winston.

At that point Stephanie’s interruption was very curious.  “You mean I have a daddy AND a sister?”

So her mother had to explain that Winston was a boy, so technically he couldn’t be her sister.

“Oh, brother,” Stephanie said.

And her mother told her how she had gotten so homesick that she brought Stephanie with her and came back to her home in the New World.  “And that’s the story, from the ground up,” she concluded.

Stephanie scrunched up her fairly cute face and started a new series of questions.  “Why don’t they ever call us?”

“Because we don’t have a telephone.”

“Why don’t they ever Skype us?”

“Because we don’t have a computer.”

“Why don’t we have any pictures of them?”

“We do.  That picture on the wall over the fireplace is them.  I know it’s a little blurry, but let me tell you clearly that those are your daddy and your brother.”

Stephanie got up and stepped over to the fireplace to examine the photo.  “I always thought they were pirates, or Jedi knights, or something.”

Her mother frowned.  “Why would a have a picture of pirates or Jedi knights over my fireplace?”

“Maybe because you knew I like pirates or Jedi knights?”

“No, I have it there because I love your daddy and your brother.”

Now if Dawson were here, he would probably try to make a joke about the man in the picture saying in a deep, dark Jedi voice, “Look—I am your father,” but Stephanie wasn’t old enough to get the joke.  Instead, she sat down on a toadstool and continued her list of questions.

“Why don’t they ever write to me?”

“Because you can’t read or write.”

“That’s just wrong.  Why don’t they ever write to you?”

“They do,” her mother answered, “but it takes a long time to get here by snail mail.  The snails get seasick crossing the ocean, you know.”

Stephanie made a face, “I don’t want to be sick OR see sick,” she said.  But then, after being thoughtful for a minute (which was a new record for her), she said, “So a family can be close even if they’re far away.”

Her mother smiled.  “That’s right.  That’s exactly right.”

“Then maybe we should call it close away instead of far away.”

“That’s a fairly good idea.  Our family is close away,” said her mother, still smiling.

Then Stephanie asked, “Can I write them a letter?”

(Obviously Stephanie didn’t know the story, or she would remember that she couldn’t write.  Duh!)

Her mother just smiled and suggested, “Why don’t you tell me what you want to say, and I’ll write it for you.”

“And then,” Stephanie excitedly, “maybe we can get a rabbit to take it to them by hare mail.  That should go fast!”

“Now, honey, how would a rabbit get across the ocean?” her mother asked, sensibly.

“You’re right—he would probably flounder in the waves, and somebody would have to fish him out.  But maybe he could get a ride on a sailfish.  I heard they’re cheap.”

Her mother smiled again.  (She smiled a lot, if you haven’t noticed.)  “Now you’re just being silly.  But let me get some paper from the drawer and a pencil from the pen, and we’ll get started on your very first letter.”

“A-OK, Mom, but I have a question,” Stephanie said.  “Who was born first?”

“Well, if we go all the way back there was Abel, then Cain…”

(I know, it should be easy to make a joke about Abel’s name, but I just can’t do it.)

“No—seriously.  In our family, who was born first?”  Stephanie insisted.

“Let me see,” said her mother, putting on her glasses.  “There was your father, then me, then you, and then Winston.”

Stephanie smiled.  “That’s good.  I always wanted a little brother.”

And Stephanie was fairly contented with her new, close away, family.

Now if the ice cream doesn’t fall out of the freezer and melt all over the cat, then next time I will tell you the story of Stephanie and the Fairly Bad Pet.

Unemployment–Protecting Our Tax Dollars

The Lord must figure I need more practice in dealing with frustration; He’s put me head-to-head with the world of unemployment.

When the company and I couldn’t arrange a less stressful position (necessary for my recovering mental health,) we “separated amicably” and I was thrown on the mercy of the job market and the Department of Labor.  The first is a behemoth that chews you up and spits you out; the second provides the condiments.  For the 1 or 2 of you who have not encountered these things first-hand, let me share a few of my experiences and roadblocks, in no particular order.

  • I applied for Unemployment Insurance.  There is no place on the application for “separated amicably”–the closest are “laid off due to lack of work” or “quit.”  They didn’t lay me off; so I opted for “quit” with an explanation.  Result:  my benefits are being withheld pending investigation.
  • According to legal definition on the application itself, any effort that produces or could potentially produce income is considered work.  Therefore, my self-employed side jobs (preaching, public speaking, consulting, and writing) are considered a business.  Result:  my benefits are being withheld pending investigation.  Investigation involves a 5-page questionnaire regarding officers of the corporation and who is writing the checks since I am unemployed, etc., and three years of tax returns.  If I write even 1 sentence that is designed for future publication for money, that counts as a day of work and reduces my weekly benefits by 25%.  (I could do it and not tell them, and several government employees have suggested I do just that, but I suffer from a virtue called integrity.)
  • The Department of Labor offers workshops to assist in the job search,  but requires you to sign up for them.  The web site offers no information on how to sign up for them.  When I call the local unemployment office–sorry, they want to be called Workforce these days–I am told that I have to come into their office to reserve a spot.
  • When I arrive at the office and request a spot in a workshop, I am told that they cannot help me until I am “registered” with them; when I try to register, they tell me they can’t help me until I have filed for unemployment.  Since I have already jumped through that hoop, they give me the registration form and tell me to have a seat;  the form is 8 or 10 pages long and takes 20 minutes to fill out.  It requires me to enter my NYS identification number, which I will not receive until after I have registered.
  • After I have registered and waited a little longer, I have to meet with a representative who must enter my information into their computer system before I am officially registered and issued my number and a card.  The representative is a two-fingered typist; if that weren’t bad enough, she was interrupted by 2 phone calls, a visit from another client needing help, and a former client who wanted to show her a new baby.  My time with her was over an hour.  After all that was finished, she was able to get me an appointment the next day with a career counselor–her fifth choice.  ( “He’s pretty good, too.”)
  • Visit 2 to the Workforce office gives me a very helpful 1-hour consultation with a knowledgeable and helpful counselor named John.  In addition to answering specific questions and offering good advice, he informs me that the services of the office are free on demand to anyone at any time during regular business hours.  It is NOT necessary to be jobless, to apply for or receive unemployment, or even be registered in order to get help.  (He does say that registration is helpful for their records, but not required.)
  • After meeting with him, I still want to sign up for a workshop.  I am directed to the resource room, where I sign in, show my registration card, and am told to sit and wait.  After 10 minutes, a representative calls me into a cubicle to ask me what I want.  I provide the name, date, and time of the workshop I want (all information I got from the web site); he has to check the calendar on the wall to see if it is really being offered, and then looks up the date on the computer to confirm that it is really being offered, and that there is room for me.  Finally, he signs me up for the workshop, held a week later.
  • Visit 3 takes me to a workshop that starts 30 minutes late due to a staffing issue and gets out more than an hour early due to lack of material to cover.  I discover that the purpose of the workshop is to teach me how to navigate the Department of Labor web site and use its links to career exploration.  I had already discovered that; it had recommended the workshop.  (The site directs you to the workshop; the workshop directs you to the site; and the wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round….”) 
  • Along the way, I have discovered that the county will generously provide an escort for me if I need to leave the room to use the lavatory.  Thankfully, I don’t have to register or sign up in advance for that service.

At this point, I have invested more that six hours and 60 miles of driving and have not received a check, and have no idea when or if I will get one.  On the bright side, the Resource Room representatives tell me that once my unemployment has been approved, the Department of Labor will send me a registration form and an appointment for a required Orientation meeting so that I can learn what the local Workforce office has to offer and how to begin to use their resources. 

This is just my opinion based upon my limited experience with the whole system, but it seems to me that the Department of Labor is doing a great job of saving taxpayers’ money by making it difficult for those in need to access their benefits and services.  Just imagine how much more they could save if they had more staffing and procedural requirements!  The liberals and progressives are right:  apparently, the key to saving our economy and reducing the deficit is creating a bigger bureaucracy and providing more government jobs.

As the philosopher Vizzini said, “INCONCEIVABLE!”

No Teleprompters Pt. 2–A Bible Study

Last week I wrote about a Biblical prophecy regarding the coming 7-year judgment on the earth that we know as the Tribulation.  Early in that time period, Christians will be persecuted, and this persecution will give them an opportunity to testify what Jesus Christ has done for them.  They are told NOT to plan, prepare, or script what they are going to say, but rather to let the Holy Spirit fill their mouths with words and wisdom that cannot be contradicted or “resisted”.

At that point I left off, leaving open the question of what it means that the testimony of the Spirit of God will not be resisted, and suggested that you, Gentle Reader, do some research or come to my class on Sunday.  For those who couldn’t make it, here were my conclusions.

I read the Bible literally.  If His words cannot be resisted, then they can’t be resisted.  Everyone who hears His testimony will believe in the person and power of God.

HOWEVER–That does not mean that they will all gladly accept the message.  According to Rev. 6:15-17 and 9:20-21, many will flee from God and would rather die than repent.  They believe the Word (just like the demons do in James 2:19) but they would rather tremble and seek death than seek mercy and peace with the Savior.  Why would they stubbornly do that rather than receive salvation, peace, and a home in glory for eternity?

The answer to that question is two-fold.  Many of those who do believe and gladly receive the Gospel will die for their faith (Mark 13:12; Luke 21:16; Rev. 7:9-17; and Rev. 14:1-13).  Now, to the true Christian today, we say we would rather die in righteousness than live in wickedness–but if you haven’t noticed, a lot of us who name the name of Jesus are living in wickedness even without the threat of death upon us.  But I can imagine that some in that day, out of the evil and fear in their hearts, will reject salvation rather than risk martyrdom.

The other reason why many will believe in the judgment of God but refuse His deliverance is found in 2 Thess. 2:1-12.  The apostle Paul, under the inspiration of that same Holy Spirit, taught that, at some point during this 7-year period, God will send confusion to the minds of those who have rejected Him up to that point, so that they will believe “the lie” and be eternally condemned.  In other words, according to vv. 11-12, God will no longer allow some the choice of salvation.  They have had their chances; His Word has been clear and believable; and still they have rejected Him as Savior and Lord.  Their time is up.

Would a loving God do that?  A loving God would give them chances–perhaps many chances–to be saved.  And He has.

Would a holy God allowed open rebellion in His Heaven?  A holy God might allow it on earth for a time–but that time will come to a sudden and final end.  And woe unto those who delay receiving Him!

Gentle Reader, while this is a cautionary teaching about the future, it holds a principle for us today.  If God is calling you, believe AND receive Him.  Today is the day of salvation.  Drawn by the Holy Spirit, call out to the Father in the name of Jesus Christ, and pour your heart and life at His feet.  Don’t worry about getting the words right; just speak from the heart–no teleprompters allowed.

Extremists–A Political Opinion

In a classic case of  “the pot calling the kettle black”, President Obama this weekend accused GOP candidate Romney of holding extremist views which he will certainly implement if he is elected to our nation’s highest office.  He’s hypocritically right on one count, and, I hope, wrong on the other.

Extremism is a measurement of how far someone’s beliefs vary from some fixed point.  In most cases, that fixed point is called “the mainstream”–whatever that is.  How does one define mainstream?  Is it determined by use of public opinion polls, comparative voting records, historical analysis, or some other measurement?  Let me illustrate this point:  if I accept (as I do) the teachings of the Bible as clearly taught by a comprehensive, literal understanding of the Book, then from the standpoint of the Scriptures, I am not an extremist (for want of a better term, I guess I would be normal).  However, if the fixed point of reference is the religious beliefs of the average American today, I would be so far out of the ordinary that I would be called an extremist.

So is candidate Romney a political extremist?  When compared to President Obama, he certainly is.  When compared to the opinions of democrats who consider themselves progressives, liberals, or moderates, he certainly is.  When he is compared to the general population as portrayed in public opinion polls, he is somewhat extreme.

But if the same measure is used of President Obama, the same thing can be said of him.  He endorses and voted to maintain all forms of abortion, including the late-late-late term “partial birth abortion,” which opinion polls consistently oppose.  His voting records in the state legislature and in the Senate were so far out of the mainstream that his voting record was measured as the “most liberal” of all lawmakers during his terms.  His most recent budget proposal was so extreme that it did not receive a single vote in either house of Congress.  And I’m not even going to talk about what the average American would think about the President if they truly understood his agenda with regard to foreign policy, immigration, and welfare.

But Candidate Romney wants to see dramatic changes to Medicare–a stand not supported by the average citizen.  The scope of his proposed budgetary cuts scares a lot of Americans.  His economic proposals regarding the demonized large financial institutions would be opposed by a majority in a popular vote.  And since public opinion polls for the past two years have shown more support than opposition for gay marriages, I guess his position on the traditional family would be called extremist, too.

So let’s concede that Gov. Romney is at least as much an extremist as President Obama;  will he implement those beliefs in the form of policy changes?  The president is limited by the US Constitution as to what he can do.  Any policy change that affects a current law must be passed by both houses of Congress.  Any constitutional change must be approved by Congress and the state legislatures.  The powers of the President to implement a new agenda are limited by both the Congress and the US Supreme Court; and any candidate who promises to make sweeping changes upon election is blowing the smoke of wishful thinking into our faces.  (For example:  does Gov. Romney really believe that he has the power to repeal the Affordable Health Care law?  Congress might have something to say about that.)

Unless, of course, a president chose to ignore the Constitution and the laws; unless he ordered his executive departments NOT to enforce existing legislation; unless he were willing to assign the privileges of citizens to illegal immigrants; unless he were willing to ignore the 9th and 10th amendments; and the like.  It is hypothetically possible that a president could implement policies in such ways–but that would be beyond extremist; that would be radical.

Fairly Entertaining Week-end Reading

Many years ago, I wrote a handful of stories for parents to read to their children.  They were intended to be interesting enough to hold the attention of a child, but entertaining enough (with jokes, puns, and other wordplay) that adults would enjoy them as well.  I never did anything with those stories.  Until now.

Since I cannot write as work while I am on unemployment, I have started revisiting these stories and tailoring them to my grandchildren.  They are not deep, inspiring, or instructive, but I think that you may find them fun to read.  So, for your reading pleasure, I offer

Stephanie

A Fairly Tale

You’ve probably read some fairy tales at one point or another in your life.  I don’t like fairy tales, because they have people like kings and wicked queens and woodsmen, and porridge and glass slippers and other things I have never seen in my life.  I like stories to be about things I can understand.  And why do people call them fairy tales?  Most of them don’t even have fairies in them!  I know about the fairy godmother, but whoever made up that story didn’t know a fairy from a pumpkin.

So I wanted to set the record straight—oh, please forgive me, the youngsters won’t understand me if I write like that!—I wanted to set the iPod straight.  There are fairies here in the New World, and you’ve probably known one or two yourself.  I know one quite well, for she lives near where I grew up in the Catskill Mountains.  (There used to be cats there, but they are all gone for some reason.) 

You may have met this fairy yourself along the way.  For a time, she was the First Assistant Tooth Fairy for all of New York State, and she did a fine job, except for the time she left a Canadian Loonie under Dawson Baker’s pillow when she meant to leave an American dollar.  (She always thought that she must have gotten that coin from a Canada goose, but actually we have a lot of loonies in our mountains.)

One day, this fairy bought a lottery ticket and won a million dollars in American money and decided to travel across the ocean and visit the Old World while she was still young.  She started in England but got mad and went to Ireland instead.  There she met a leprechaun, and fell in love, and got married, and had twins, and I’ll tell you more about them later if you are still reading.

But then our fairy got homesick (she was really only allergic to the curtains, but she thought it was the whole house making her itch.)  So she used the last of her money to return to the New World, and made a home under a maple tree in a sugar bush near my house.  If you don’t know, a sugar bush is one sweet place to live!  When a whole lot of Maples live on the same street, (or avenue, or drive,) the saps who make pancake syrup call that a sugar bush, but this fairy just called it her home, sweet home.

She was out of money and looking for a job, but her life was full of excitement because of her daughter Stephanie, who came with her from Ireland, and I’m glad she did, because she’s the one I really want to tell you about.  I only told about her mother because she’s going to be in the stories too, so you needed to meet her.

Stephanie was a fairly.  No, I didn’t misspell that; she was a fairly.  Since her mother (you know about her) was a fairy, and her father was a leprechaun, Stephanie turned out to be a little bit of both, so her parents called her a fairly.  (Now, I know a particularly smart girl named Emilie who remembers the story so far and wants to know about the other twin, and she’s not very patient so I’ll tell that part next.)

Stephanie had a twin brother named Winston, who lived with his father in Ireland.  And was Winston a fairly too?  No, don’t be silly!  Since his father was a leprechaun and his mother was a fairy, he was a leprefaun.  (That may be a hard word to say, but I know good readers like Joshua can do it.)  And Stephanie and Winston were not identical twins, so we should be able to tell them apart during our stories.

Since Winston stayed in the Old World with his father, I never met him, though I might someday when I’m in my 60’s or 70’s.  But I know Stephanie fairly well, because she lived near my house and I liked to look for nuts in the sugar bush.  (I know, it’s crazy!  If I wanted to find lots of nuts I should go to Washington, D.C., or maybe to Canada; but I was too sensible to do that.)  So I went to the sugar bush, and I met Stephanie, and the stories I will tell you in the weeks to come will be about her and her fairly exciting life.

I hope to see you soon with the next chapter of what I call my “Fairly Tales”.

Illustration courtesy graphic artist Sharon Dahl.  Thank you!

 

 

Theological Politics

A letter to the editor in our local newspaper today excoriates a political candidate for misrepresenting Catholicism–for promoting policies that are not loving and sharing enough.  It seems odd to read this concerned Roman Catholic writer condemn the politician for religious hypocrisy, while he himself promotes a candidate who supports abortion rights (which are a clear violation of Vatican doctrine and policies).

Well, I’m not Catholic, but I can tell you what kind of political positions the Bible promotes:

  • Moral laws and just (and swift) punishments;
  • A flat income tax;
  • Distrust of powerful government;
  • Parental control over education;
  • Utilizing our natural resources, but doing it wisely;
  • Work as the normal means of income/support;
  • Family responsibility for its own elderly and poor;
  • Sanctity of human life and marriage between a man and a woman;
  • National exceptionalism, and intolerance toward enemies of the state;
  • Equal opportunity for every individual to grow from the condition into which they were born;
  • Protection of private property;
  • Wisdom and benefits in seeking profit;
  • Individual concern and care for the indigent–especially widows and orphans.

I could go on, and I could give you Scripture references for every one of these points.  And come to think of it, I could give Constitutional references for most (if not all) of them as well.  And I do not believe that we can expect God to bless out land if we knowingly violate His principles as we understand them from His Word.

Socialist, Progressive, Liberal, Moderate, Conservative, Libertarian, Anarchist–all of these are titles defining a political viewpoint.  Let me add the most important one of all:  Bible believer.

No Teleprompters Allowed! A Bible Study

Don’t you hate it when you ask a question and all you get for an answer is a canned, preplanned, predetermined scripted response?  That’s the problem I have with so many of the touch-tone telephone contact menus–the recorded voices often don’t answer MY question or allow any follow-up.  It’s also why I have stopped watching most of the presidential candidate debates:  the answers are already written, practiced, and memorized, and will be recited regardless of what the question is.  (I do follow the debates by reading various sources the following day to see if someone actually said something new or important.)  It’s when people get away from the script and speak their mind that we get a true picture of who they are and what they believe.

In the Gospels, Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 all cover the same teaching from our Lord concerning the coming 7 years of judgment on the earth; and both Mark 13:11 and Luke 21:14-15 both refer to an interesting detail.  Once the false prince arrives on the scene, accompanied by war, famine, disease,and all kinds of troubles, many believers will be killed for their faith–but before they are killed, they will be given the chance to speak.  And what should they say?

Whatever comes out of their mouths!  The believers of that day are specifically told NOT to prepare a speech, and not even to think about what they are going to say.  (If, as I believe, all the people in question have been Christians for only a very short time, they might not have the Biblical knowledge  or spiritual maturity to give a convincing answer.)  Rather, the Holy Spirit will speak through them in words of wisdom that the adversaries will not be able to refute or resist.  When the Spirit speaks, He will reveal Who He is and what He stands for–without any misplaced modifiers or debatable statistics!  And the listeners will know that they have been spoken to, and will not be able to ignore His message!

Does that mean that the church today should just sit around and wait for the Holy Spirit to do our witnessing for us?  No, He plays His own role in the process; but it is we as followers of Jesus who are commanded to go, preach, and make disciples.  And if we are going to be effective, we do not need a scripted, predetermined testimony–we need to have some Scripture in our heart, a salvation experience we can share, and a genuine love and concern for the lost souls around us.

So–when Luke 21:15 says that the adversaries will not be able to resist the words of the Holy Spirit, is that a commentary on the Sovereign Grace vs Free Will debate?  Does it mean that they will all become believers themselves?  Or does it mean something altogether different?  Study the passages I have referenced along with Revelation 6-7 to discover the answers, or come to my Sunday School class this week!

Eeyore

As I was doing some reading this morning, I discovered a cross-curricular phenomenon:  the Winnie-the-Pooh-as-psychology industry.

Just go to your favorite search engine and type in some combination of the words depression, Milne, Eeyore, ADHD, Pooh–and you will soon find dozens of sites that take all the fun out of A. A. Milne’s classic children’s stories.  The internet experts go so far as to diagnose not only Pooh, Piglet, Eeyore, and Tigger, but even Christopher Robin, Rabbit and Owl.  It seems there is no one “normal” in the 100 Acre Wood.

Obviously, with my experiences, I focused my research on Eeyore:

The old grey donkey, Eeyore stood by himself in a thistly corner of the Forest, his front feet well apart, his head on one side, and thought about things. Sometimes he thought sadly to himself, “Why?” and sometimes he thought, “Wherefore?” and sometimes he thought, “Inasmuch as which?” and sometimes he didn’t quite know what he was thinking about.
A. A. Milne From book Winnie the Pooh

“Good morning, Eeyore,” said Pooh.
“Good morning, Pooh Bear,” said Eeyore gloomily. “If it is a good morning, which I doubt,” said he.
“Why, what’s the matter?”
“Nothing, Pooh Bear, nothing. We can’t all, and some of us don’t. That’s all there is to it.”
“Can’t all what?” said Pooh, rubbing his nose.
“Gaiety. Song-and-dance. Here we go round the mulberry bush.”
A. A. Milne From book Winnie the Pooh

One can’t complain. I have my friends. Someone spoke to me only yesterday.
Eeyore
From Winnie the Pooh by A. A. Milne

 So what is the consensus of the experts?  Our favorite disfigured donkey is either

  • Realistic
  • Fatalistic
  • Stoic
  • Exhibiting a Melancholy Personality
  • Mildly depressed
  • Suffering from Dysthemia
  • A victim of Limbic System ADHD

(Some of the above diagnoses overlap; others contradict. )

Here’s my conclusion:  Eeyore is an interesting fictional character, consistent in portrayal, and with his complete “case file” written and on hand.  If the “experts” cannot agree on a diagnosis for him, what hope do any of us real, inconsistent, and incomplete humans have?

Seeking treatment, taking medication, following prescribed therapy, and all the rest are steps of faith, which may be in short supply for the mentally ill.  Pray for those around you who suffer, that they will get proper early diagnosis and treatment, so that they can focus their limited faith in the Almighty, and not have to waste it on doctors.

Doggerel

I learned long ago that I was not likely to attract most students to poetry by using sonnets, Tennyson, or Longfellow; I had much greater success at the introductory level with doggerel.  Though not considered literature, these little poems are cute and memorable, and have inspired many a student to try their hand at the gentle art of poetry.  Here are a few of my favorites.  Love them or hate them–I didn’t write them.  (I should research and try to give credit to the authors, if known.  I’ll put it on my bucket list.)

Roses are red,

Violets are purple,

Sugar is sweet,

And so’s maple syrple.

 

I never saw a purple cow–

I never hope to see one;

But I can tell you anyhow

I’d rather see than be one.

 

A tutor who tooted the flute

Tried to tutor two tooters to toot.

Said the two to the tutor,

“Is it harder to toot, or

To tutor two tooters to toot?”  –Carolyn Wells

 

Willie saw some dynamite,

Couldn’t understand it quite;

Curiosity never pays–

It rained Willie seven days.

 

Roses are red,

Violets are blue,

I’m schizophrenic

And so am I.

 

I’d rather have fingers than toes;

I’d rather have ears than a nose;

And as for my hair,

I’m glad it’s all there.

I’ll be awfully sad when it goes.  –Gelett Burgess

 

Roses are red,

Violets are blue;

Some poems rhyme,

But this one doesn’t.

 

And, for good measure, these two anonymous limericks that you almost have to say out loud in order to appreciate:

A girl who weighs many an oz.

Used language I will not pronoz;

Her brother one day

Pulled her chair right away–

He wanted to see if she’d boz.

 

She frowned and called him “Mr.!”

Because in sport he kr.

And so in spite

That very night

This Mr. kr. sr.

 

 

My Book

Thank you for your prayers yesterday. I finished Stories From the Psych Ward and uploaded it just before Midnight. It is now for sale in all ebook formats at Smashwords for a whopping $0.99! After review, it will be sent to the major distributors. It contains 16 stories–11 never published on the blog. As an English teacher, I am particularly proud of “Lee’s Story”; as a Christian, I am proud of “Preacher’s Story,” which includes the Gospel. See https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/215699 for purchase details.

Why am I charging for it?  I am unemployed, and every little bit helps; and the workman is worthy of his hire. 

So why am I charging so little?  Until I am an established and recognized author, I need to do everything I can to get my writing into people’s hands.  As I write and publish more, I will raise the prices based on value and what the market will bear.  (I originally priced this at $1.99, but felt bad when it  turned out to be only 40-50 pages, so I dropped the price this morning.  If you are the one person who bought it at $1.99, let me know and I will give you credit toward the next book.)

Wrong on (Almost) Every Level

I’ll let you read the article for yourself.  I wonder who turned this story in to the media, and why the reporter thought it was newsworthy.  Did the journalist think the student, the school, and the author were right or wrong?  Here’s my grading scale:

  • The school assigning the book:  WRONG
  • The student wanting the advantage without reading the book:  WRONG
  • The student making outrageous excuses to get out of work:  WRONG
  • The author motivating the student with sex, drugs, and profanity:  WRONG
  • The author telling the student to do her  own work:  RIGHT
  • Overall grade: 20% (F)

I wonder what the story would have been if a committed Christian had gone on line protesting the book assignment as a violation of God’s standards and her personal spiritual convictions.  Would she have been portrayed as a bigot rather than as a lazy teen; or would the story even have been acknowledged?

Hold on, Christians–I’m afraid the ride is just going to get bumpier before we get to the streets of gold!

To Lose One’s Mind

An icebreaker exercise used with middle schoolers to get them talking and appreciating their blessings is the old question, “If you had to lose one of your senses, which one would you choose to do without?”  Thankfully, most of our teens never had to really make that decision.

But our older generation is facing a similar situation, without the element of choice thrown in.  All those of a certain age would concede that, to one extent or another, we are losing our minds.

The ravages of Alzheimer’s Disease are well-documented and tragic.  One of the saddest stories about Ronald Reagan in his diseased years came from a former aide and friend who visited him in his office at home.  The former President did not know his friend, and was reading a picture book about horses.  Upside down.  Unfortunately, the conditions behind that story are being played out in homes and facilities across our country.

When my father was suffering with cancer in 2008, he went through some episodes that left him convinced that Jimmy Carter was President.  Every time he woke up, he wanted to know where he was, what had happened, and what the doctor had said;  every time he fell asleep, he lost his memory.  Eventually, he regained his strength and memory and had a few more good months before his body shut down and the Lord took him Home.

But what’s the excuse for a middle-aged man like me who doesn’t have Alzheimer’s or cancer?  Why does mental illness strike and rob of us our most precious sense–our sense of mind?  Why am I suddenly so distractable?  Is there such a thing as late-onset ADD?  And why can’t my memory hold onto things like it used to?

When I was principal of a small Christian school in PA, I knew every parent’s name, kids, address, and account balance.  Now, when I go into my most recent place of employment, I can’t call my co-workers by name unless they have their name tags on.  The distant past is like a tapestry–the pictures and story are there, but are sometimes hard to make out or to see how one part of the picture relates to the rest.  The recent past is like the back of a poorly-made tapestry–threads and knots, an unruly mass of color and texture, but without apparent meaning.  (A recent article I read–somewhere–talked about how depression changes the brain and makes it harder for memory linkages to form or be renewed; it also talked about actual brain shrinkage, if I remember right.)  UPDATE:  I found the article.

But perhaps as bad as losing my memory is the frustration that comes with the realization that I am not what I once was.  I have been looking for a file containing vital documents necessary for a job search.  I know where the file was in August of 2010; I know where it was in January of 2011.  Today, I have no idea where I might have put it for safekeeping; and in the past week I have spent at least 8 hours looking for it.  I have scanned every document in the filing cabinet at least 4 times; I have searched every box in my study, closet, and garage more times than that.  I have looked on every bookcase, shelf, and cabinet we own.  All the documents can be replaced; but that’s beside the point:  I have spent two full days in utter despair and helplessness over my failure to remember and locate the file. 

I spent several years without my sense of smell; my eyesight and hearing are not what they once were; the food goes by too fast to relish the taste; and the sense of feeling is too intense in my joints and not intense enough in other places.  But none of these changes  or deteriorations can compare to the heartbreak of losing my mind.

I am not looking for pity, but I would value your prayers.  And if I have helped anyone to better understand the ravages of mental illness or senility, then my time spent has been worth while.

 

When Mental Illness Doesn’t Get the Help It Needs

There’s a tragic story in the NY Daily News that points out a problem faced by individuals and families everywhere:  the consequences of untreated mental illness.  I have written before about the difficulty of obtaining adequate treatment in our area, and have received divergent responses.  Those who are involved at the entry level/diagnosis/referral end of the spectrum tell me there is a drastic lack of follow-up resources and options;  those on the treatment end tend to tell me that the services are available.  While I am only a sufferer and not an expert in the field of mental illness, I wish you would indulge me as I make a few observations.

  1. People who are mentally ill may not seek out or accept help.  I required an intervention to get me to the crisis center, even though I knew I had become a danger to myself.  The processing into the system is complicated, difficult and stressful, and I would not have made it through the process if not for my wife and daughter.  Once I was through with the hospitalization, the medications helped me out of bed in the morning, but they couldn’t get me to my counseling sessions through the Prospect Mountain construction traffic.  I had to force myself to go–and my guess is that not every sufferer is strong enough to make it to follow-up meetings.
  2. Sufferers may have an unrealistic sense of their own illness or the necessity of the treatments offered to them.  I have had several times when I thought I was better, only to put myself in situations I could not handle.  There is an aspect of my treatment that I am convinced is quackery and ineffective; and I have had to trust someone else’s wisdom, and force myself to do what I don’t believe in if I want my recovery plan to continue.  There have been many suggestions from my therapist that I have not even considered, because my mind is closed to those ideas–rightly or wrongly, I don’t know.  I often think that I can do it on my own, when reality (in the form of my wife) tells me I can’t.  I think a lot of my fellow sufferers who truly want to get better still have the mistaken idea that healing will come on its own with time (and perhaps some pills).
  3. In-patient treatment requires not only financial considerations, but availability of beds, and, sometimes, legal action.  In the case of the young man in the news article, a judge could have committed him to an in-patient facility on earlier occasions, but almost certainly the patient would not have wanted it, and the level of his acting out may not have made him a priority for the limited space.  The concept of “preventive” admission for a short-term stay still leaves the issue of follow-up to be considered (or ignored).  Mental illness is like a back injury:  if serious, it requires drastic measures in the hospital, and then months of follow-up therapy both in and out of the hospital.  Mental illness is different, though, because the sufferers can still walk around and be a threat to themselves or others, and it may be difficult for them or for the justice system to know when the hospital admission is an absolute necessity.
  4. Short-term treatments are helpful for patients like me, to point us in the direction of recovery.  For others, though, they are no more than minor inconveniences.  I met fellow sufferers who were just waiting to get discharged so that they could throw themselves back into their self-destructive behavior.  One patient, knowing that the stay was temporary, continued to conduct his illicit business by phone daily, and returned to it apparently unaffected by the services offered during the short-term stay.  By the way–my experience was that the various meetings, seminars, and sessions during the week I was there were only offered, but not required.  There were fellow sufferers I saw at meals, but at no other time.  While that may have caused some to have a longer stay, others were discharged on schedule.
  5. And one last note for today:  there are some issues–serious, life-dominating, family-destroying issues–that are not addressed or even acknowledged during the short term stay.  I asked my therapist about this, for the issues came up often in group meetings, but the leaders quickly changed the subject as if they had been instructed not to go there.  My therapist first suggested that it was out of confidentiality and that the topics would be covered in private counseling sessions.  When I countered that to my knowledge (based on my experience and inquiries with others)  such had not been the case, her second thought was that some topics are so complex that they take years of therapy to work through, and there would be no sense in trying to deal with them during the typical six-day stay.  I do not doubt her assessment at all; but I wonder how many sufferers are going to follow up for years to deal with issues apparently not considered a problem during their short-term jump start on recovery.

My therapist emphasizes the importance of spiritual–and specifically Christian–components to recovery from mental illness.  I fully agree and pray that some day I will find the miraculous healing of Christ for my troubled mind.  In the meantime, I can only pray for strength for myself and for fellow sufferers to cry out, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner, and give me my daily bread; for Yours is the Kingdom and the power; and I can do this one thing today through Christ who strengthens me.”  I know it’s not much of a prayer, but it’s what I can handle.  I am a Christian and I am sick; but He is Christ, and He is the Healer–in His time.

VP Ryan?

Months ago I predicted that President Obama would win reelection this fall.  (OK, I also predicted a third-party challenger, but let’s not bring that up.)  What is my take today, now that the major players are apparently all in place?

No change.  Paul Ryan will make a difference, but I don’t believe it will be enough.

Paul Ryan will appeal to the conservatives who were ambivalent about Mitt Romney, and will be anathema to liberal-minded Democrats and independents.  His budget will be a lightning rod, attracting strikes from those who believe that the GOP wants to eliminate Medicare, Social Security, school lunches, contraceptives, and chewing gum.  (I made that last one up, but you get the point.)  He will be the “attack dog” for the Romney campaign, which has been in desperate need of moving away from its defensive pose.

Unfortunately, a Republican “attack dog” is almost certain to bring the nasty tone of the campaign even lower; and we all know what President Obama has done to dogs in the past.

The choice of Paul Ryan will solidify conservative support, but will contribute to the alienation of seniors, women, minorities, and independents.

It’s too bad that the most qualified candidates are too smart to run. 

Pray; give; campaign for your candidate; be wise as serpents and harmless as doves; and may God show mercy on us and our land.