Stories From the Psych Ward–Charlie’s Story (Teaser)

I have been encouraged by the response to my little stories and character sketches inspired by my stay in the hospital.  In the last week, I have been able to write 8 or 9 more, in preparation for collecting them in book form.  While I don’t expect to publish any more of them here in their entirety, I thought I would give you a taste of what awaits when the book comes out.

Charlie’s Story

            It was sometimes hard to tell the patients from the staff on the psych ward.  The techs were encouraged to dress in street clothes rather than scrubs, and to do their best to fit in with the community; so clothing was not always a clue.  The first night I was there, I was convinced that one of the patients was a tech, and that one of the techs was a patient.  There was also a visitor that I thought was a patient, but then again she probably should have been, so she doesn’t count.

            Some of the others you couldn’t miss.  There were the ladies that shuffled around the ward in hospital gowns and robes.  There was the elderly man with a walker, who wouldn’t speak or even look up when spoken to.  There were the patients who would stand too close and speak too loudly and tell too much of their stories to strangers.  There was one young man who wandered the halls in a daze, day and night.  And then there were the Charles Mansons.

            There were three “Charlies” on our ward.  These were men who had neglected their own physical well-being.  Painfully thin, they looked like they had not eaten in a month or two, and their piercing eyes made you wonder what—or who—they might be hungry for.  With long uncombed hair and bushy beards, they tended to stare at anyone who came near.  One moved a chair into the hall near the nurses’ station, and sat cracking his knuckles and intimidating the visitors (and some of the patients).

            I got to know one of the Charlies as our circumstances drew us together throughout the day.  Though frightening in appearance, he was one of the gentlest and most tragic figures I have ever met.  And his name really was Charlie.

            At 6’4”, he towered over all the other members of the community.  He couldn’t have weighed more than 180 lbs. (160 without the hair and beard), though he told me that just months earlier he had been over 300.  He lay in bed all day and all night, his feet hanging over the edge, and his eyes watching the hall through the doorway.  He said he slept, but if he did, it must have been so lightly that the slightest sound or movement would awaken him.  He told me that he had slept away the past 9 months of his life, and that he might sleep away the rest of it.—he had nothing to wake up for.  I took that remark as an invitation to ask him his story.

            Oh—before I forget—he wore a red union suit.  You know the kind; the one-piece long underwear with the drop-flap in the back?  That’s what he wore, in slightly faded but still devilish red; and that’s all he wore, regardless of how often the techs would bring him other clothes to substitute or put on over his own.  One day he wore a shirt to attend dinner, but I never saw him with pants or shoes.  At least he kept the flap buttoned up.

 

Interested? I’ll let you know when the full version is available.  Sorry, Beth–you’ll have to wait a little longer for Charlie to tell his tale!

“They”

Sometimes you just come across a quote too pertinent and too well-written to pass by.  This is from the western novel The Hair-Trigger Kid by Max Brand.

There is the story-teller who never speaks in his own person, too.  All his stories begin, end, and are supported in the middle by “they say.”  “They” of “they say” is a strange creature.  It has the flight of a falcon and the silent wings of a bat; it speaks the language of the birds and bees; it can follow the snake down the deepest hole, and then glide like a magic ray through a thousand feet of solid rock; it can penetrate invisibly into houses through the thickest walls, in order to see strange crimes; it can step through the walls of the most secretive mind in order to read strange thoughts.  “They” has the speed of lightning, and leaps here and there to pick up grains of information, like a chicken picking up worms in a newly turned garden; “they” throws a girdle around the world in a fortieth of Puck’s boasted time.  Those who quote “they,” who quote and follow and mystically adore and believe in “they,” sometimes do so with awe-stricken whispers, but there are some who sneer at their authority, and shrug their shoulders at the very stories they relate.  Such people, when questioned, yawn and shake their heads.

“I dunno. That’s what ‘they’ say.”

You can make your choice.  Believe it or not.  Most people choose to believe, and therefore the rare information of “they,” thrice, yes, and thirty times watered and removed, is repeated over and over until it becomes a mist as tall as the moon and as thin as star dust.

So much for anonymous sources. And they say westerns aren’t worth reading.

Classrooms and Cash

One of the most tragic books ever written is The Thread That Runs So True by Jesse Stuart.  A fictionalized autobiography, the book traces Stuart’s real-life progress from teaching in a one-room schoolhouse to being superintendent of a large school district, with an ongoing theme:  how closely education is tied to finances and politics.  It ends when Stuart has to leave education and become a sheep farmer in order to afford to get married.

In this age of high-powered teacher unions, many forget the image of the underpaid teacher.  (HINT:  look at private schools and see 30-year veterans making less than $20,000/year.)  But the link between education and finances is still very real.  We see it every day in the calls for more cash for classrooms–more state lotteries to benefit schools, more government programs, the need for more technology and improved facilities, increasing property taxes even in the face of declining property values–and the list goes on and on.

But one of the least-understood aspects of the educational/financial relationship involves student loans.  While other debts can be forgiven in bankruptcy, student loans cannot; and when those loans are federally-guaranteed, the consequences of nonpayment can be dramatic–including the reduction of Social Security retirement benefits.  (See the article here for details.)

Once upon a time, a student could work his way through school; not any more.  Not long ago, families understood that while college was a good thing, it was not necessarily an affordable option, so the young people entered the work force instead of racking up thousands in debt.  Before school loans were guaranteed, banks had the choice of denying payouts to those with little likelihood to repay.  The time was when a student graduated in four years and could pay off any school loans in roughly the same amount of time; neither of those timetables are the norm any more.

And, not so long ago in a land not so far away, parents and grandparents who cosigned loans for their loved ones saw to it that the loans got paid.  Apparently, when the going got tough, a lot of people mortgaged their Social Security–and now the tax man has arrived to take possession. 

Don’t feel sorry for the colleges, though.  They got their money.  On time.  Every time.  And still they raise tuition at a rate more than double the rate of inflation.  Go figure.

The Gold Rush

One of the highlights of our vacation was a visit to the Transportation Museum in Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada.  Among the artifacts from the construction of the Alaska Highway in the 1940’s, and the age of steamboats on the Yukon River during the first half of the 20th Century, were a few photos and items from the Klondike Gold Rush of the 1890’s.  Though I have read a good deal about this era, seeing the representations reminded me of some spiritual applications.

When news of a gold strike reached the states, whole families traveled north, through tortuous conditions, just in the hope of having a better life.  Most went home disappointed.  Aren’t you glad that, as Christians, our gold is guaranteed and forever?  And don’t you wish more people would diligently seek the One Who is, and is the rewarder of those who seek Him?

Many prospectors traveled north over the Chilkoot Pass, with hundreds of steps carved into the ice-covered incline, in the hopes of having a chance to look for gold.  However, a requirement established for public health dictated that each person bring 2,000 lbs. of supplies–requiring about 20 trips up and down that steep pass in order just to qualify for the inspection to allow them into the region.  Many pack animals couldn’t survive the trip (hence “Dead Horse Pass”) and dozens if not hundreds of men failed in their attempts to reach the “promised land”.

Aren’t you glad that we don’t have to amass and carry a ton of good works in order to enter God’s presence?  “For by grace are ye saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God–not of works–lest any man should boast.”  If we know Christ, the way has been made smooth, our tickets are prepaid, and one day the Great Conductor will arrive in that Glory Train to take us to the place where gold is pavement and the Lord is the true Treasure!

Mental Illness Goes on Vacation

I wish!

But my mental illness didn’t go on vacation; it just accompanied me on mine. 

It joined me in the airports at Newark, Toronto, and especially Vancouver.  It spoke up just once during a bumpy spot in the air.  My depression is being held at bay, but the anxiety is fueled by the break from routine and the many unknowns around me but beyond my control. 

Things at home are beyond my control, too.  Relatives are staying at the house, but the dog bit a repairman.  There may need to be electrical work in our bedroom.  Dad Edwards is in the process of his chemo.  Short stories are awaiting the typing and rewriting process, which I can’t do on this notebook.  And of course, there is the whole job situation….

So in the meantime, I try to stay calm, appreciate the kiddos, and be a good father and poppa.  You don’t know how hard it can be until you have lived there.  And I hope you never have to live there.

R.I.P. Religious Freedom–August 1, 2012?

While many aspects of the Affordable Health Care Act do not take full effect until 2014 or later, one feature kicks in next Wednesday:  the requirement that employer-provided insurance coverage include abortions and other procedures and products considered sinful by many religious Americans.

Most people know that churches themselves and their subsidiary ministries are exempt; but secular businesses (and non-profit organizations) whose owners or directors are morally and spiritually opposed to providing contraceptives or abortions to their employees will have to choose between obeying their religious convictions and facing government penalties, or obeying the law and facing the displeasure of God.

Thomas Jefferson wrote, “No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority.”

This issue was not addressed by the US Supreme Court in their recent ruling, and is certain to be the subject of lawsuits for years to come.  So what can we do in the meantime?

  • Pray that people of religious conviction will be true to their conscience, regardless of the consequence;
  • Pray that judges will issue the appropriate restraining orders to stop implementation of the law or assessing of penalties;
  • Pray, campaign, and vote intelligently for Congressmen and Senators who will dismantle this attack on people of faith.

Unfortunately, it won’t do any good to contact your current legislators at this time.  They will not take any action until after the election, and the deadlock between the houses virtually guarantees no favorable action in lame-duck session.  After the first of the year, it will all depend on how America votes in November.  Pray for wisdom and righteousness to prevail.

Therapy Pays Off

In addition to medication, supplements, and counseling, I have been writing these little posts and short stories as an outlet for my creativity.  My recovery has been slow, and I still have bad times and difficulties finding pleasure in God’s blessings.  People ask me if I am excited about my upcoming trip to visit my children and grandchildren; I am honest enough to say that I am glad I am going, but it has been many months since I have been truly excited about anything.

But last night I almost smiled.  I had a sense of accomplishment.  God led me to the mountaintop, and I got a glimpse of happiness.  My first attempt to self-publish one of the stories as an ebook was successful, and a dozen people had downloaded it before I even knew it was available.  It will be a few days before its final review is completed and it is added to the catalogs at Amazon and Barnes and Noble, but it has been officially published, and the goal of eventually publishing the collection of Stories from the Psych Ward has taken a giant leap from “Maybe” past “Someday” all the way to “I can get this done!”

Let me ask a few prayer requests:

  • Please pray that the story will make others aware of the reality (and pain) of mental illness;
  • Please pray that this free story will stir enough interest so that people will want to buy the collection;
  • Please pray as I write “The Preacher’s Story,” which will include a Gospel presentation;
  • Please pray as I edit and type the 5 stories that have piled up while I was formatting “Eva’s Story”;
  • Please pray for stability.  It is common for a depressive episode to follow a victory or success (just ask Elijah about that.)

In the meantime, you can download the published story here or by clicking on the image above and save it directly to your Nook or Kindle; or download the PDF version and read it on your PC.  (Sorry–the RTF version still has some kinks.)

Thank you for your support and your prayers.

A Different Sermon

In the near future, I will be preaching at my son-in-law’s church on the mission field.  I am well-experienced in preparing and presenting Bible messages, but preparing a sermon for indigenous people is a whole different story.  These are people who have a strong oral tradition, based on storytelling and a cyclical (as opposed to linear, exegetical) approach.  Derek Baker and I have discussed this approach over the years–during his training and since he has been on the field.  So I thought I would try my hand at it.  I sent the following treatment ahead for approval, and both Derek and Jen think that it will work.  Now it’s up to the Lord to help me with the presentation.

I cannot imagine preaching Revelation 4-5 like this in any of the churches I have attended over the years; but, in this post-Christian era, we may find someday that we have to use a similar approach in order to reach a generation that has never been exposed to the Bible or the wonderful message of God’s grace.  Let me know what you think.

What God Reveals

Revelation 4-5

God opened a door for a man named John to see into His Heaven.  And what did he see?

1.  He saw the throne of God, occupied by the Almighty and Indescribable Father of all things, and surrounded by beauty.

2.  He saw seats for the elders.  These are the men who knew God, and served Him, and delighted to be with Him.  They wear crowns, for they are worthy of respect.  But they are not God.  They were made to worship and serve God, and learned to do so through their lives on Earth.

3.  John saw the power of God, shown through lightning, thunder, fire, and the wind of His Spirit.  But nature is not God; it was made for His pleasure, and to point us to God.

4.  There were also four remarkable beings made by God.  They are spiritual creatures, wise and with wings, yet with faces familiar to us:  a lion; an ox; a man; and an eagle.  As wise and powerful as they are, they are not God; they are creatures made to worship and serve God.

5.  He saw angels–millions of them, mighty and loud.  But they were not God.  They were created to praise and serve God.

6.  He saw the world.  In God’s hand, it looked to him like a little book, or a scroll, and it was sealed up as if the world had shut God out, and didn’t want to know God or have Him move in their lives.   The world was not God, though God held it in His hand.

7.  He saw despair, as all Heaven sorrowed for the earth that had shut itself away from God, and was missing His beauty and His glory.  He saw anguish as all the creatures of Heaven cried out for a way for God and His world to be reunited in beauty.  The elders could not open the world to God; the four living creatures could not open the world to God; the millions of angels could not open the world to God.  Only God could make a way.

8.  So Father God made a way to open up the earth to Himself.  His way was a special being that we read about in other places–Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and God Himself.  John saw him as a Lion in power, a King in authority–and a lamb, offered as a sacrifice.  For the world’s separation from God is called sin; and the only remedy for sin’s effect was a blood sacrifice.  Yet no animal was worthy to die for the sins of the world; no man was worthy, for every man had sinned and was separated himself.  This lamb, Jesus, had proven that He was worthy, by winning the greatest victory of all time.  He had died because of sin, but He defeated death and came back to life because He was the Son of God, and just as much God as God the Father.

9.  And John saw every creature in Heaven and on the earth worshiping and giving glory to Father God on the throne, and to the Lamb of God.

Rev 5:13-14  And then I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and in the sea. They sang: “Blessing and honor and glory and power belong to the One sitting on the throne and to the Lamb forever and ever.”  (14)  And the four living beings said, “Amen!” And the twenty-four elders fell down and worshiped the Lamb.

Can we say those words with every other living creature, or are we still living a life separated from God?  We can come to know Father God and Jesus the Son of God, but only if we are willing to worship them.  For they are God.

 

E-books and the Future of Literature

Last week it was announced that, for the first time ever, more fiction novels were sold in e-book form than in hardcover.  That’s a scary thing for purists who like the feel of paper in their hands, and worry about all that will be lost if technology either degenerates in some electronic holocaust or progresses to the point that it leaves today’s e-books obsolete. 

I sympathize with the traditionalists.  I love my Nook, but it lacks the advantages of my physical library.  I can’t pull a book off the shelf and lend it to my wife or son or a student, and share with them the magic of an author’s inspired words.  Yes, there is a “Lend” feature, but my wife’s Kindle isn’t on speaking terms with my Nook.

But there is one advantage to e-books that I appreciate and hope to use to my own advantage:  the rebirth of the short story.

Print media in our age had all but abandoned the short story.  True, there were annual “Best of…” anthologies, but who read them?  The traditional outlets–newspapers and magazines–had either gone out of business or had severely limited the stories they published (and of course they preferred established writers whose names on a cover could stir up a handful of additional sales.  Textbooks tried to choose and include modern short stories, but they preferred the avant-garde, the politically correct, and (again) the known authors rather than allow popularity, reprint history, and longevity to determine what was literature worthy to be read.  But e-readers have changed that.

I have read more short stories in the past year and a half than I had in the preceding 20 years.  I’m cheap, so I troll the “Nook Book Deals” for free or low-cost titles that interest me, and I have discovered a world of hopeful writers, and a handful of really good ones.  I have encountered everything from “Flash Fiction” to character sketches to novellas and novelettes that I never would have seen had my wife never given me my Nook.  (Caveat:  there is a LOT of trash out there, so be discerning in what you download!)  And it gives me hope as an aspiring writer.

Regular visitors to this site know that nearly every Friday I post a short story or character sketch inspired by people I met in the hospital.  My goal, if I am up to it, is to write 20 or 25 of these little vignettes, and then arrange and publish them in electronic form.  I won’t have to find a publisher or spend a lot of money on printing and binding; the advent of e-books has made self-publishing feasible and affordable even for someone with such a skimpy writing resume as mine.  And while they will never substitute for my primary income, I can give a few away stories to build interest, and then charge a reasonable fee for the collection to reward my effort.

If you should wonder why I am weekly giving away a story that I may hope one day to sell, fear not; for every story that I post here, there is another in the file waiting to go into the book.  As I am growing healthier, I have progressed from one story per week, to two, to three–and one day, maybe, I can write every day.  It takes me about two hours to write a story in longhand on a yellow legal pad, and then another three or four to edit, revise, rewrite, type, and proofread it.  I never type or revise a story the same day I write it–I let it age for a couple of days (or more) so that I can approach it with a fresh eye.  I have discovered an interesting phenomenon:  for whatever reason, after two or three days I often do not remember writing the words on the paper in front of me, so I can approach them more critically and objectively.  And, yes, I frequently do research to supplement my knowledge of a specific condition or treatment; and I sometimes pass my work along to medical professionals for their input regarding the accuracy of the writing and the ethical considerations of writing about medical patients.

Let me encourage Chris, and Lora, and Kim, and Marina, and Gaileen, and Amy, and Steve, and Ken, and all the other former students and associates who were aspiring writers–the time is now.  There is no excuse.  You are the future of literature, and the e-book is your medium. 

Update:  The first story–a new one–is now available for free at https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/208433.  Pending review, it will go to distributors like Amazon and Barnes and Noble.  In the meantime, even if you don’t have an e-reader, you can download it as a PDF file and read it on your PC.  In the first 12 hours, without any publicity, it was downloaded 34 times; won’t you make it 35?

Stories From the Psych Ward #5–Maureen’s Story

This is another in the series of fictionalized accounts inspired by people and situations I encountered during my stay in the hospital.

Maureen’s Story

As I was becoming acquainted with the members of the community on the ward, I saw Maureen.  To be honest, I thought that she was a tech the first time I saw her.  She was sitting in the activity room reading, and each time Eva or Gwen had a question or problem, they looked to her for help, and she responded in a calm and comforting voice.  When she got up, she carried herself with the confidence of a professional, and when Eddy need a translator, she stepped in and told the nurse what he was saying.  But, at the same time, there was something about her…

The next morning we met again in community meeting, and she volunteered to go first in listing her goals for the day.  Her goals were reasonable and attainable, unlike some of the ones mentioned by the others.  The only thing that gave a clue to her illness was her last goal:  that when her husband left after visiting her in the evening, she would like to say goodbye without breaking down.  So she was there for some sort of psychological condition that made it difficult to maintain emotional control.  I could certainly understand that, in light of my own problems!  And the more meetings we both participated in, the more I felt like I knew her.

The second afternoon I felt comfortable enough to speak to her.  We were sitting alone in the activity room when I asked her if she would mind if I asked some questions, since she seemed to know what was going on.  She told me to go ahead.

So I asked her about ECT.  Ever since I had arrived on the ward, the nurses and techs seemed to be urging me to ask my doctor about some therapy that “worked wonders” to restore stability in depressive patients; but I didn’t know anything about the treatment or even what the letters ECT stood for.  I asked her to tell me what it was and how it worked.

Electroconvulsive therapy was a shock therapy, she told me.  The doctors hooked electrodes to the forehead and gave a little electrical current to reset the mind to an earlier, healthier state.  She showed me where they would put the electrodes, and explained how it was different for left-handed people.  She knew what she was talking about, and explained the technical medical procedure to me in terms that I could understand.  Even so, I was surprised by it all.  Her description called to mind something out of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, and I wasn’t aware that anything like that was still being used.  It certainly didn’t sound like something I wanted to do.

I thanked Maureen and complimented her on her knowledge and ability to explain things.  She told me that she had been a nurse—a hospice nurse until she couldn’t handle it any more, and then an in-home caregiver.  She told me how she would get discouraged at work—so disturbed by her discouragement that on two occasions she had driven her car off the road on the way home.  Another time, more recently, the mere thought of having to go to work made her so anxious that she had backed her car into a tree in their front yard.  That event had landed her on the psych ward and in the ECT program.  She spoke about her experience in a matter-of–fact way, and I felt free to ask more; with Maureen it was more like talking to a family member than to a stranger.

Why do the nurses and techs promote ECT so much?

The doctors who work on this ward specialize in it.

Is it considered experimental?

She didn’t think so—her insurance covered it.

How did it work?

The science wasn’t definitive on that, but apparently when the appropriate parts of the brain go into convulsions, some harmful neural connections were disrupted.

Is it a one-time thing, or do patients need more that one treatment?

It varied, but always several sessions were needed, and sometimes many were necessary.  She herself had received more than twenty treatments, and was scheduled for another the next day.

She was so calm—so matter-of-fact that her statement took me by surprise.  Here was this young lady who appeared healthy in every way, telling me that she had a severe mental illness requiring drastic treatment measures!  It was more information than I could process right then; so I thanked her once more and excused myself.  I went to my room and tried to take a nap, but I couldn’t get Maureen or our conversation out of my head.  It was like I felt an emotional connection with her—not a romantic one, but something else I couldn’t explain.  Finally I got up and asked the nurse to give me something for anxiety.

After dinner, it all became clear to me.  Maureen had company, and they were sitting in the music room.  As I passed by, I looked in and did a double take.  I knew Maureen’s family—better than I wanted to.  And then I knew Maureen.

She had been married to my cousin a few years back, and the break-up had been very unpleasant, with both families more involved than we should have been.  The last birthday party where relatives on both sides attended had been broken up when the neighbors called the police. 

Whether it was the passing years or my mental state, I had not recognized Maureen until I saw her with her new husband.  Once I realized who she was, I began to think about the awkwardness of our situation.  Could we be in the same emotionally-charged group meetings without some family friction coming out?  I thought that I could handle it; after all, I wasn’t the one who had called her those things (that was my brother).  But I wasn’t sure how she, especially in light of her fragile mental state, would handle it.  I asked to speak to the nurse privately, and described the situation.  She agreed that it might be a problem.  She told me that she would speak to Maureen’s therapist, and one of us might need to be moved to a different ward.

The next morning I was informed of the decision:  it would not be a problem for Maureen to be in sessions with me as long as I was all right with it.  My presence wouldn’t bother her at all.

After all, she didn’t remember me.

She didn’t remember my cousin.

In fact, she didn’t remember ever having been married before.

The treatments had wiped out the memories.  Maureen was blissfully unaware of that tragic chapter of her past.

I wondered if maybe I should look into getting the treatments myself.

Shielding Children vs Exposure and Instruction: A Study

As an educator in private Christian schools, I got it from both sides:

  • Proponents of government schooling claimed that our students were too sheltered; and
  • Proponents of home schooling claimed that our students were too exposed to social influences.

Now a study has been released with an interesting take on the issue.  Admittedly, the survey group is small, and the article does not provide enough information on which to base definitive conclusions; but what has come out is fascinating and potentially instructive.

Six- to nine-year-old girls were given a variety of dolls and told to pick the ones that they liked the most, or which represented what they wanted to be, or would be considered the most popular.  No surprise–about 70% chose the sexualized doll dressed in tight and revealing clothing as what they wanted to look like, and what they thought would be the most popular.

Here’s the interesting part:  the researchers divided the children on the basis of whether or not their mothers were religious.  Some of the children of religious mothers were less likely to choose the sexualized dolls, while others overwhelmingly did choose them.  The difference?  Exposure to media.

Daughters (of religious mothers) who were exposed to “…a lot of media” were less likely to choose the sexy doll;  similar daughters who were not exposed to media “overwhelmingly” chose the worldly image The conclusion of the researchers? 

The study also found that girls who consumed a lot of media but had religious mothers were less likely to choose the sexy doll, likely because their mothers held more conservative values such as modesty, the publication reported. But girls with religious mothers who did not consume a lot of media overwhelmingly did choose the sexy doll, in what the authors called a case of “forbidden fruit” that the girls idealized due to a lack of exposure to it, LiveScience reported.

It would seem from this study that children who were aware of the evil and were inoculated against it by proper biblical teaching turned out better than those who received the teaching alone without the context of the exposure.

So should we let out kids wallow in the muck of media licentiousness so that we can teach them more effectively?  Certainly not.  The study did not follow these pre-adolescent girls into their teen years or adulthood to find out how these childhood perceptions affected later thinking or behavior;  and another study showed that exposure to sexual media in the teen years had dramatic negative effects on attitude and behavior (potentially undermining any previously established convictions to the contrary).

My conclusion?  We should teach our children to be in the world but not of the world while they still admire and listen to their parents; and we should keep our teens busy and shielded through those years when they seem to be least receptive to parental instruction.

What was the most revealing conclusion of the first study?  Baptists, close your ears!  Girls who were in dance classes were LEAST likely to choose the sexualized dolls, perhaps because of healthier and more realistic perceptions of body image.

Parents, we have a hard enough job to do without losing our kids in their pre-teen years.  Wisdom says we should follow His Word and knowledge; and if the information in this blog causes you to stop and think about your parenting strategies, then my job is done.  For now.

Another Marginally Threatening UN Treaty

There has been quite a kerfuffle in the past few day in the Home School/Parents’ Rights communities over the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.  The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee has scheduled a committee vote for this Thursday, and is hoping for a vote of the full Senate by July 26.  The treaty would seek to apply many of the provisions of the US Americans with Disabilities Act, already in force here at home, to disabled Americans traveling abroad.  A big selling point is that it would be a benefit to disabled veterans if they visited or were assigned to other countries.

The arguments against the treaty are three-fold:

  1. That the benefits to Americans abroad have been exaggerated and impossible to enforce;
  2. That the treaty would eliminate US sovereignty and put our family courts under UN bureaucrats–which the government denies;
  3. That this UN Convention is being rushed through the Senate, without giving adequate time for review and informed advice and consent.

First of all, any treaty we sign becomes part of the supreme law of the land, according to the US Constitution, and is a surrender of a bit of our sovereignty.  However, our legal system does not, in reality, work that way.  Most judges do not base their opinions on a literal reading of the Constitution, and most will not bother to read, let alone be guided by, this treaty.  And let’s not forget:  the treaty is modeled after the ADA, which is already in full practice throughout the US.  While ANY United Nations treaty is a surrender of US rights to a foreign body and as such is despicable to Constitutionalists like me, it will have no impact on parents’ rights or home schooling here in the states.

Secondly, the benefits to disabled Americans abroad HAVE been exaggerated, exactly to the same extent that the danger to parents here at home has been exaggerated.  The UN has no enforcing power to make any nation do anything, short of sending in troops (if they can get volunteers).  The usual penalties are monetary fines on nations in violation–fines which many nations cannot pay, and which, historically at least, the US has refused to pay.

The weakest argument–the one that will make its detractors look the most foolish–is the idea that this treaty is being pushed through so fast that the senators don’t have time to read or consider it.  In reality, the treaty was negotiated in 2006; was signed by President Obama in 2009; and was introduced to the Senate in May of 2012.  Anybody who wanted to think about the issue has had plenty of time.

I, too, am opposed to this treaty because of its surrender of US sovereignty; but I am realistic (cynical?) enough to believe that in the long run it will be ignored like the 9th and 10th Amendments.  Does that mean we should sit back at let it happen?  No.  What should we do?

Nothing can happen with this bill until it clears committee, and we in NY have no senators on the committee–we have no one representing us there, that we could lobby.  However, we need to watch the news and see whether it passes in committee, and then contact our senators to express our opposition to the bill.  Our senators are very liberal and tend to be internationalists, so our letters will not change their minds; but large numbers of contacts from opponents of the treaty will be reported to them so they know we are out there.  In reality, no senator wants to go on record as opposing help to disabled children or wounded veterans, so it will pass the full Senate easily.

Does that sound defeatist and fatalistic?  Yes.  The only remedy for this bill, if it is God’s will to intervene, is PRAYER.

So I will pray, and I will contact my senators about the surrender of US sovereignty–the other arguments I will leave alone.  I will also contact my senatorial candidate, who may choose to use this as a campaign issue.  But other than praying, I’m not going to bring out the big guns for this fight.  There are larger and more significant battles coming up.

[Some may complain that I didn’t provide links or phone numbers (or even names) for our senators or senatorial candidate.  If you do not know who they are and cannot figure out how to contact them, you probably are not informed enough to contact them and address the issue in an appropriate manner.  Do your homework!  Nobody ever said that being a patriot would be easy.]

Update:  the Senate committee today (7/19) postponed any action on the treaty indefinitely.

An Honest Obituary

You have probably heard the old joke about the man who went to a preacher to arrange a funeral for his brother.  “You must say that my brother was an angel,” he insisted.  The preacher protested that his brother had been notorious as a drunk, a womanizer, and probably the most wicked reprobate in town.  The brother offered $10,000 to the preacher, but only if he agreed to say that the man had been an angel.  The preacher accepted;  and at the funeral he fulfilled his obligation by saying, “This man was a terrible, evil sinner–but compared to his brother, he was an angel!”

We come from a society of pretty obituaries; we were all taught not to speak ill of the dead, and if we “don’t have nothing good to say, don’t say nothing at all.”  But one brave family placed an obituary in our local paper yesterday, and it was the most honest (and tragic) one I have ever seen.  If nothing else, it paints a pretty good picture of what mental illness can look like in the flesh.  As you read it, please remember that this is a man for whom Jesus lived and died; and there, but for the grace of God, go we all.

Dennis W. Trainor (1940 – 2012)

Chenango Forks: Dennis W. Trainor of Chenango Forks, NY (2/23/40-7/10/12) decided to end his life in the place he loved best: his home and sanctuary in the Chenango Forks wood. Born in the Bronx, he spent his early years negotiating difficult circumstances with defiance, energy, and determination: jumping off the docks into the river, visiting Edgewater and smelling the vibrant life there, catching trains and riding the length of Manhattan Island, sleeping on rooftops and trying to find ways to survive. He was always proud to be a Bronx native; one of the family residences on Bruckner Boulevard was razed to make way for the Triboro Bridge. He spent too many of his teen and young adult years bouncing from institution to institution, struggling with his addictions and mental health issues. Sometime in the 1970s, his brother Frank convinced him to try living in Binghamton. After many therapeutic interventions and 12-step meetings, Dennis found life-long sobriety in August 1980. In 1982, he moved to a remarkable retreat and safe place in the woods overlooking the Tioughnioga River. He loved living there; he could listen to and feed the birds, cut firewood with an old-fashioned handsaw, try to find ways to live with his many ghosts, demons, hopes, and his firm moral and spiritual code. Dennis was a bundle of complexity and contradictions: incredibly smart yet often irrational, he was a charming and charismatic child-like spirit who could quickly turn angry and afraid. He possessed a searing intensity and determination yet often couldn’t complete the simplest tasks. He felt that he had a very limited capacity to “be in the world,” as he would say; he characterized himself as a hermit, a cowboy, a spiritual seeker, a rebel, a recluse—but never as a comfortable member of society. No amount of rational conversation or pleas could change his beliefs. He was doggedly determined to live his life on his own terms in the best ways that he could. He lived alone since 1996, although he had a close, long-time friend who tried to help him and care for him, as well as relatives, neighbors, and others with whom he developed superficial but deeply important relationships. Although he depended on minimal social services for his very basic needs, he never wanted to feel indebted to any person, agency, or government. So despite his meager resources, he paid enormous interest to clear an old loan for an aborted semester at BCC circa 1980. Because he knew that cigarettes were destroying his health, he quit smoking forever in 1997. In fact, other than a very rare round of antibiotics and occasional OTC pain-relievers, he shunned all medications. If he had accepted help and used prescription anti-depressants or other medications to help him cope with his mental and emotional illnesses, he might still be alive. But he chose his path carefully and deliberately. He saved enough money to pre-pay for his final arrangements because he did not want to burden us with those details of his death. Dennis loved so much about his life: the full moon, the changing seasons, the river, the birds and rabbits and deer and hawks. Yet he carried on a relentless battle against the flying squirrels who reside in the attic and the rodents who pilfer bird feed. Dennis adored 50s bebop and rock, classic cowboy movies and TV shows; he also venerated series such as The Sopranos and Deadwood. He tilted at too many windmills for too long, and he refused to concede a defeat that would have been enormous if he had lived to the point where he could no longer care for himself. Because he wanted a simple, unencumbered life and wanted to live as frugally as possible, he gave up car ownership many years ago; he rode his bicycle to the Forks—in all weather–for his newspapers, milk, bread, and his mail. For several years until shortly before his death, he depended on the BC County Rural service to take him to a grocery store so he could buy what he needed to survive. Dennis so appreciated the lifeline that the BC Country dispatchers and drivers provided. He came to see them as friends and he valued his interactions with them. When the powers that be decided that BC County routes would be almost eliminated (not “cost-efficient” to provide essential services to the most needy among us), Dennis was shaken and scared because one of his few safety nets had been severed. We will never know why he chose to end his life when he did; we know that a constellation of forces contributed. But he would want folks to know that he did all that he could to live and die on his terms. He often quoted the Bible – “let the dead bury the dead”— so he did not want us to mourn him or memorialize him publically. We hope that he would understand why we are publishing this obituary as a way of honoring and remembering him. Dennis was predeceased by his parents John Trainor (1959) and Helen Trainor (2/19/12), his cherished sister Patty (2/25/97) all of the Bronx, his brother Frank (12/18/11) of Pennsylvania, and his dog Willie. He is survived by his long-time close friend Susan Y Williams of Eastham, MA and formerly of Binghamton and Chenango Forks, by his dear sister Mary Bianco of Holbrook, NY, his sister Joan Meehan of Endicott, NY and many nieces and nephews, all of whom will miss him dearly. Special thanks and deep gratitude to Dennis’ neighbors, Jim and Joyce Thomas, and to the people who helped him survive as long and well as he did, especially the dispatchers and drivers of BC Country. Thanks to the first responders, especially the State Police investigators, and to Tim and Donna of DuMunn Funeral Home, who helped us through these horrible first days. In lieu of flowers, consider donating to the Southern Tier Independence Center, the Broome County Country bus service, or a mental health or suicide-prevention organization. If you cannot contribute, please take time to look up at a full-moon or take a walk in the woods or provide a helping hand to someone who needs it. To forward condolences please visit www.demunnfh.com. Arrangements for the family are directed by the DeMunn Funeral Home.
Published in Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin on July 15, 2012

 

Stories from the Psych Ward #4–Ethel’s Story

Here is another in my series of fictional accounts inspired by people I met while I was in the hospital.

Ethel’s Story

 

            Ethel sat at the table and sobbed out her story after lunch.  Most of the community members had wandered off, but I sat back and listened, and a couple of others came and went.  Her roommate Dierdre sat across the table from her as Ethel             melted down and opened up.

            To be honest, none of us knew Ethel.  She had arrived sometime in the past day or two, and kept to her room.  I hadn’t seen her in community or group meetings, or in any of the activities.  Dierdre had convinced her to come to the dining hall for lunch once or twice, but only after most of the others had left.  Though most of the women either wore casual clothes or hospital gowns with robes, Ethel wore a dress.  It had been stylish 30 or 40 years ago.

            I was accidentally aware of part of her story already.  My room was across the hall from the pay phone, and with my door open (as it always had to be) I couldn’t avoid hearing some of the conversations.  Ethel had been called to the phone earlier that morning; and, though I could only hear one end of the conversation, I could tell that it was her employer, and that it wasn’t good.

            “Yes, sir; in a day or two, I’m sure…No, sir, they don’t think it’s anything serious, but the doctor wanted to admit me for a day or two for observation….No, sir, I’m sure it had nothing to do with the job; I just haven’t been sleeping well…No, sir, I’m going to be fine, and…sir, I understand I don’t have any sick time left but…No, sir, please don’t do that.  I promise I’ll be there in a day or two…yes, I know how busy you are…I understand, sir, and I would never ask you to hold my position if I weren’t…Oh…Oh…I see…Yes, sir, I understand, but can’t…Yes, sir.  I’ll be in to pick up my check…Goodbye.”  And that was the prelude to the crisis in the dining room.

            What I didn’t know until that afternoon was that Ethel’s husband had passed away within the last month, and that, in her own words, she was stuck.  She had to adjust to living on her own, and she had no idea how to cope.  She didn’t drive; her husband Ron had always taken her everywhere.  She had never written a check or paid a bill or used a credit card; Ron had handled the money and gave her cash each week for grocery money.  They had never had children, and she had always stayed home as a housewife until a year or two earlier, when her husband had asked her to get a part-time job to help out.

            She had enjoyed being a housewife.  She loved to cook and sew; she made her own clothes.  Her pies were always a hit at the church socials, and all the neighbor kids looked forward to trick-or-treating at her house, where they always got her homemade pumpkin popcorn balls.  Her life had been what she had always expected it to be:  breakfast at 7; pack a lunch for Ron; household chores like washing and ironing and dusting and mopping the floors until noon; soup and a sandwich for lunch; a soap opera or two on television, and then dinner on the table at 5:30.  Evenings were often spent with knitting or needlework while Ron listened to the ball game, then to bed at 10.  If it was a rut, she was glad to have been stuck in it.

            It wasn’t that she couldn’t have had a career if she had wanted one.  After high school she had taken a secretarial course at the local business college, and she was a good typist, and better than average at taking dictation in shorthand.  But then she met Ron, and there was no need to work.  He always had taken care of her, and even apologized when he sent her out to work.  And then he wasn’t there any more, and all she had to count on was her job.  And now she had lost her job, and she was stuck.

            Dierdre had been listening intently, and questioned her about losing her job.  Didn’t she know that her employer couldn’t legally fire her because of a disability, and the problems that landed her here counted as a disability? 

            Ethel said that she knew, but it would mean she would have to tell her boss where she was, and why—that she had “gone crazy”—and she couldn’t do that.  She worried what the church ladies would say if they knew she was in the “nut house”.  She said she was just glad that she didn’t have any children; her mother had been “put away” in her later years, and now here she was herself.  At least it would stop here.

            Nonsense, Dierdre argued.  Nobody thought like that any more—this is 2012, for goodness’ sake!  Mental illness is a sickness—a treatable, curable sickness that she shouldn’t be ashamed of.  In fact, Ethel should be proud of herself that she was getting help!

            Ethel just sobbed and shook her head.  She couldn’t accept what Dierdre was telling her.  She expected that she would be locked up for the rest of her life, and even if she got out, what would she do?  No one would hire a crazy lady for their office.

            Dierdre shifted gears and suggested that Ethel could work from home.  She understood that a lot of medical transcription was still being done that way, and she would be able to use her skills in a productive and profitable way.

            No, it wouldn’t work, Ethel maintained.  She didn’t have her typewriter any more, so how could she work from home?

            She was stuck.

All Men Are Pigs

Last night, Darlene and I had something of a movie date on the back porch:  we watched a DVD of Finian’s Rainbow.  Today’s blog is not intended as a film review, so I will not report the rude, disparaging remarks we enjoyed making as we watched this lame excuse for a musical.  However, one of the songs clearly illustrated something that I have often said:

All men are pigs.

I could talk about the total depravity of mankind, and the decline of modern culture, and the technological temptations facing males today, but I won’t.  The fact is, since ancient times men have chased anything with two X chromosomes.  As Tommy Steele sang, “When I’m not near the girl I loves, I loves the girl I’m near,” and “If they has bosoms, I woos ems.”  Bad grammar aside, it’s a good rotten social commentary.

I used to have a student who disagreed with my assessment, and protested that her dad was NOT a pig; I told her to go home and ask her father.  She came back and reported that he agreed with me, but she could not accept it:  she would rather see her father as a liar than a pig.  I truly admired her naivete.

So is there any hope for humanity?  Of course:

  • Men may BE pigs, but they don’t have to act like them.  I understand that some even make good house pets; and
  • Women looking for a husband need to accept the fact that all men are pigs, and just try to pick the cleanest one they can find.

Oink.